EY stated
that “the Project [still] retains a high level of inherent risk”. The firm said
that the risks included “a series of complex and significant activities” which
will command a “high planned spend rate”.
Cited as
examples were construction at the North and South Dams, continuing power plant
installation, turbine and generator installation, HVDC commissioning, and the
approaching winter.
Why should the
issue of “high level of inherent risk” justify revisiting?
