The
appointment of Tom Marshall to head the Tory Administration heralded not just
an end to a failed Dunderdale Premiership; it caused an expectation, though a modest one, among an
angry and hopeful citizenry of fundamental change in the way the Government operates
and communicates.
That sense
of hope might have engendered a belief the new, if temporary, Premier had heard
their protests; that he understood why they were angry. It wasn’t that Tom Marshall had excelled as a
Minister. He had not. He had bullied critics alongside Kennedy and
Dunderdale. He had implemented no oversight procedures for Muskrat, engaged in
excessive deficit spending in Finance and asked to be relieved of the Finance
job when he found the going too rough.
The public’s
optimism was associated less with any prior manifestation of leadership than
with a belief that he could not possibly have mistaken the reason Dunderdale
was banished.
There was
another reason, too.
The Tory
Leadership Convention, delayed until July, implies a five month hiatus before a
more permanent successor claims the reins of power.
That
Marshall might use the opportunity to implement immediate and necessary change
is not entirely presumptuous.
The
Government has been on a joyride since the world price of oil hit $140/barrel;
government is in a fiscal mess. Muskrat
Falls is a public relations nightmare and a potential public policy disaster; the
Government has chosen secrecy over accountability. There is little talent in the
Cabinet including in the important Finance and Natural Resources portfolios.
What was the
opportunity given Tom Marshall?