A letter
written to the Editor of the Telegram on January 9th, by downtown
St. John’s business owner, Bob Hallett, was more than a thoughtful message
about a group frequently taken for granted.
It was a
reminder that commerce, however small, is serious business; that fiscal
prudence, in an economy in which government is the largest player,
is at great risk especially when there is, according City Councillor, Art Puddester,
“a vacuum of leadership”.
At the
provincial level this is an all too familiar theme. In recent years, fiscal
drunkenness has reduced the travails of entrepreneurship to the mantra: “I
believe in Newfoundland and Labrador”. Except, in the real world, this is the
empty bravado of ‘cheerleaders’. And it doesn’t pay the bills.
Bob Hallett spoke
of many challenges, stating “…we persist — because we love this city, and the
old downtown, and we believe in it”.
Mr.
Hallett’s missive was, perhaps, less an epistle, than a lament. He was inspired
to protest as a result of continuing tax increases on City residents and on businesses.
Lately, the City went so far as to levy the part of the tax applied to business
“occupancy” on “unoccupied” property, too.
Hallett’s
letter was preceded by complaints in media interviews by downtown
travel business owner, Peg Norman. It seems they have inspired others to fight
City Hall, too.
Hallett’s
worries are genuine even if they are a bit late and incomplete.
He states the
City has “an optimistic and expansionist fiscal agenda…divorced from economic
reality”. That’s essentially true. Recent
tax increases reflect the temporary acceleration of an economy “white hot”; buoyed
by excess spending and a mega-project environment, already winding down.
In this town
and across the province, just about everyone adopted the belief that
$100/barrel oil would be around forever. Not one Mayor….not one Councillor, and not just
in St. John’s, possessed the good sense to call for a reality check.
As City and Town
Halls and the Premier, too, are now discovering, unbridled fiscal exuberance is
unsustainable. At the provincial level higher rates of taxation are unavoidable; they will likely be necessary to stave off insolvency. Lathered onto municipal taxation all business, especially small ones, they will be hurt.
Politicians
at the municipal level, ostensibly those closest to the body politic, should
have been the first to realize that not just small business but people generally, especially the elderly, pensioners,
and others on fixed incomes, never did keep pace with the promise of high oil
or all the hoopla. Yet, Mayor Dennis O’Keefe felt emboldened to flippantly tell the media that
an octogenarian, living off Mount Scio Road, whose assessment had increased by
an unacceptably high 119%, could appeal if he didn’t like his assessment!
The Mayor exhibited
the judgement of the remote and indifferent.
The plaintiff
Mount Scio resident represented a clarion call for understanding, as much as a
wider demand for relief. It was an opportunity tailor-made for savvy
politicians, for leadership, and for compassion. The question is: how deep is the malaise at City Hall such
an attitude exposes?
Hallett notes
Councillor Breen’s interest in “strong fiscal management of the city’s
finances” but wonders how the claim manifests. The Mayor conducts, by his own
admission, a lengthy private negotiation with Galway on some pretext of being proactive, as other land owners are shut out of the process. Then the transaction is cancelled, as if to confirm it was not a public necessity, in the first place.
Where are
the mechanisms of oversight? How vast is the pretense to prudence?
The
leadership void is clearly large at City Hall; except municipal minds are not limited to local councils.
Hallett and
his group are essentially responding to a tax “Invoice” already received. There are
more on the way. They include not just higher provincial taxes but a doubling of power
costs, too. That is why Hallett's group have to demand that the City (and the Province) wring every cent of value out of the most necessary people and programs. They can't afford any excess.
Mr. Hallett is warned, too, that the treatment of downtown business is the same as it was decades ago; my own relationship with downtown business having spanned 27 years. Any
utterance from City Hall suggestive of affection for business people, who love
the downtown, or who want to lighten their burdens is, I suggest, is accidental and unintentional.
You did say, sir, you feel “neglected and abused”.
I was
especially alarmed by Hollett’s comment: “…in the midst of a crushing
recession, we face a tax increase….a little over 14 per cent…many downtown
businesses are looking at increases of over 20 per cent...business owners grow more and more concerned for their
very survival.”
Bob: you
need to know the recession hasn’t started!
It’s bad
enough that the City’s expenditures are forecast to grow over the next two
years; a $1.2 billion infrastructure program is laid on, too. The latter is needed to be sure but Council should not feel it has the right, carte blanche, just to raise levies without having publicly demonstrated it has put City Hall through a fiscal wringer, first.
As if to
confirm “mad” is the new normal, the City wants to spend two years digging up
Water Street, making it impossible for customers to access business premises, like Bob Hallett's and others. And,
Jonathan Galgay assures all of us minimal disruption as if normalcy is found in a gravel pit.
The truth is
the Mayor has let down his side; in place of giving leadership at a time when
the entire City region is challenged by both a rapidly unfolding fiscal and
economic debacle, he lets the junior Councillor take the lead.
In place of
displaying, not just empathy, but a sense of urgency to get the City’s costs and
taxes under control, he is content to pursue a fiscal program that, as Bob
Hollett states, is blind to economic reality.
The “…bureaucracy…is
extremely strong…and we have a council that’s extremely weak”, says Art
Puddister. At least one Councillor has a clue to the problem.
Finally,
Bob, I have a couple of suggestions which you might discuss with your group:
1. Don’t go within 100 yards of the
Board of Trade. Too many of them are cheerleaders of excess. Did you note you
were the one who had to wake them up? Your group can do quite well, on your
own. Challenge City Hall until it agrees to revamp this year’s Budget, and
revise its forecast expenditures. Don’t listen to any Councillor who tells you it
can’t be done this year. The public are on your side.
2. There’s a lot going on in
Confederation Building. It’s going to hurt you and everyone else; the Premier’s
dithering means it will take longer to resolve. People think it’s a “problem”.
It’s isn’t. It’s a “crisis”. Get ready
by getting your overheads down, including city taxes. And be warned: new ways
of being challenged will discover you!
3. With regard to the proposed Water
Street “big dig”….tell City Hall to shove it. That shove, Bob; not shovel. Anyone
who suggests business can operate in the midst of chaos, piles of rock, dust,
and debris, unkempt boardwalks, fumes, and poor access, for months at a time, does not know retail. The City dug up Water Street West, a few years
ago. Bob, I remember. I watched it in slow motion. It was horrible. And costly
to the small businesses located there. Some disappeared. Don’t let them do it to
you!
What is the solution? Tell the
City when something breaks, to fix it. And leave again. If you don’t insist on
this course, get ready to close shop. It’s that simple!
When it
comes to doing business in the Downtown, especially retail, Bob Hallett is
right when he says: “…we persist — because we love this city, and the old
downtown, and we believe in it.”
If motivated
people like him fail, the downtown will surely die.
The whole
City will be the poorer for it.
A good beginning, when Council meets on Sunday, will be to start with the leadership.
A good beginning, when Council meets on Sunday, will be to start with the leadership.
